All veggies other then
**Tomatoes and **mushrooms **Soy products
Grapes -eat just few
Herbal teas
Kale
Kelp
Leaf lettuce
Leeche nuts
Lima beans,
green
Love
Mangoes
Maple syrup- small amount
Melons (all)
Millet*
Molasses*
Mustard
greens
Okra
Onions
Parsley
Parsnips
Peaches
Pears
Peas, green
Peppers
Plums &
prunes
Potatoes* small amount
All fresh and raw fruits,
vegetables, and sprouts,
including those listed
here:
Alfalfa sprouts
Apple cider vinegar
Barley
Apples
Appreciation
Apricots
Avocados
Bananas
Beans, green
Beets & greens
Berries
Blackberries
Broccoli
Brussels sprouts
Cabbage
Cantaloupe
Carrots
Cauliflower
Celery
Cherries
Collard greens
Cucumbers
Dates
Dulse
Figs
Fresh corn
Fresh, raw juice
Fun
Goat whey
Quinoa*
Radishes
Raisins
Raspberries
Raw, cold-pressed,
Avoid Olive OIL**
flax seed oils
Sun flower seed Oil
Rhubarb

Acid-Forming Foods.

Avoid if it has 3***

Alcohol***
All processed foods
Anger
Barley
Bread, baked (or any)
Cake
Canned fruits and veggies
Cereals (all)
Chickpeas
Chocolate
Cigarettes
Coffee **
Complaining
Cooked grains (except millet and quinoa)
Corn, dried
Cornstarch
***Dairy products
Drugs
***Eggs
Foods cooked with oils
Fruits, glazed or sulfured
Grapefruits
***Ketchup
Honey, raw
Legumes
***Lemons
Lentils
Limes
*****Mushrooms
Meat, fish, birds, shellfish
Mustard, prepared
Nuts, seeds, beans
***** Olive oil all types
Oatmeal
****Oranges
Pasta
Pepper, black
*****Pineapple
****Pitzza
Popcorn
*****Soy products
***Soy beans- fresh
***Salt
Rutabagas
Sauerkraut
***Soda – any type
Crackers
****Soft drinks
Stress
*****Sugar, white and
processed
******Sweeteners, artificial
(Splenda, Equal, Aspartame,
etc.)
***Tea, black & green
Vegetables, overcooked
Vinegar, distilled
*****Vitamin C (made of citric acid)
****Wheat, all forms
******Tomatoes
All items with 2, 3, or 4 stars
need to be avoided at any cost.

Choose a day like Saturday for the cleanse, or one where you can rest the next day. You will need to be near a bathroom for the flush.

Take no medicines, vitamins or pills that you can do without; they could prevent success. Stop any parasite program or kidney herbs the day before.

Eat a simple, preferably alkalizing (salad, steamed veggies, fruit, baked potato) no-fat breakfast and lunch (no milk or butter). This allows bile to build up and develop pressure in the liver. Higher pressure pushes out more stones.

Do not eat or drink (a little water is ok) after 2 o’clock . If you break this rule you could feel quite ill later or prevent success.

Sometime before 6:00 , prepare your Epsom salts. and 3 cups water in a jar and shake vigorously to dissolve salts. This makes 4 servings ¾ cup each. Set aside, you can refrigerate if desired.

6:00 PM

Drink one ¾ cup serving of the Epsom salts. This will cause a laxative effect and open the bile ducts. You may also add 1/8 tsp. powdered vitamin C to improve the taste. You may also drink a few mouthfuls of water afterwards or rinse your mouth. Get out the Sun Flower Seed Oil and grapefruit to warm up.

8:00 PM

Have another ¾ cup serving of Epsom salts. You haven’t eaten since two o’clock , but you shouldn’t feel hungry. Get your bedtime chores done & be ready for bed. The timing is critical for success; don’t be more than 10 minutes early or late.

9:45 PM

Pour ½ cup Sun Flower Seed Oil into jar (measured). Squeeze grapefruit by hand into measuring cup. Remove pulp with a fork. You should have at least ½ cup juice, up to ¾ cup is best. You may top it with lemon juice.

Add this to Sun Flower Seed Oil. Close lid tightly and shake until watery (only fresh grapefruit does this).

Now visit the bathroom one or more times, even if it makes you late for your ten o’clock drink. don’t be more than 15 minutes late.

10:00 PM

Drink the potion you have mixed. Drinking through a large plastic straw helps it go down easier. Some like the taste of this mixture! Take it to your bedside of you want, but drink it standing up. Get it down within 5 minutes (15 minutes for weak or elderly persons).

Lie down immediately. You might fail to get stones out if you don’t. The sooner you lie down, the more stones you will get out. Be ready for bed ahead of time. Don’t clean up the kitchen. As soon as the drink is down, walk to your bed and lie down flat on your back with your head up high on the pillow. You can also lie on your right side. Try to think about what is happening in the liver and keep still for at least 20 minutes. You may feel a train of stones traveling along the bile ducts like marbles. There is no pain or discomfort because the bile duct valves are open (thanks to the Epsom salts!). Go to sleep. You may fail to get stones out if you don’t.

Next Morning.

Upon awakening take your third dose of Epsom salts. If you have indigestion or nausea, wait until it is gone before drinking the Epsom salts. You may go back to bed. Don’t take this drink before 6:00 AM .

2 Hours Later

Take your fourth & last drink of ¾ cup Epsom salt mixture. You may go back to bed.

After 2 more hours you may eat. Start with fresh fruit juice. Half an hour later eat fruit. One hour later you may eat regular food, but keep it light. By supper you should feel recovered.

How Well Did You Do?

Expect diarrhea in the morning. Use a flashlight to look for gallstones in the toilet with the bowel movement. Look for the green kind since this is proof that they are genuine gallstones, not food residue. Only bile from the liver is pea green. The bowel movement sinks but gallstones float because of the cholesterol inside. Count them all roughly, whether tan or green. You will need to total 2,000 stones before the liver is clean enough to rid you of allergies or bursitis or upper back pains permanently. The first cleanse may rid you of them for a few days, but as the stones from the rear travel forward, they give you the same symptoms again. You may repeat cleanses at two week intervals. Never cleanse when you are ill.

HPS editors note: When I did my first Dr. Clarks liver cleanse I immediately dropped over 200 pea size green and tan stones, and when I examined them I was shocked. They crushed in my fingers and what I found was pure fat, pure cholesterol, hundreds of them. Also in my second liver cleanse I had the same experience.

Sometimes, the bile ducts are full of cholesterol crystals that did not form into round stones. They appear as “chaff” floating on the top of the toilet water. It may be tan colored, harboring millions of tiny white crystals. Cleansing this chaff is just as important as purging the stones.

How safe is the liver cleanse? It is very safe. The writer’s opinion is based on over 500 cases, including many persons in their seventies and eighties. None went to the hospital; none even reported pain. However, it can make you feel quite ill for one or two days afterwards, although in every one of these cases the maintenance parasite program had been neglected. This is why the instructions direct you to complete the parasite and kidney rinse program first.

The Mechanism of the Liver/Gallbladder Flush
1. Sun Flower Seed oil stimulates bile productions in the liver.
2. Bile has to flow down to the gallbladder.
3. Lemon or grapefruit juice contracts the gallbladder.
4. Bile in the gallbladder serves as a lubricant and provides pressure to push out stones when the gallbladder contracts.
5. Epsom salts relax the bile duct (if you choose to use them).

In essence, you squeeze the stones out. However, a congested liver usually results in sluggish bile flow, which can cause sleep problems or nausea and will reduce the effectiveness of the gallbladder flush. If the problem is severe enough, the gallbladder flush may not even work at all because not enough bile will flow into the gallbladder to provide pressure to push out the stones. A decongested liver is essential for a good gallbladder flush.

These are suggestions and informational only. Always consult your doctor or qualified health care practitioner.

Ingredients and amounts

-        Fresh squeezed organic lemon juice : 2 TBSP (the lemon should preferably be ORGANIC )

-        Organic maple syrup :   1 or 2 TBSP (preferably grade A )

-        Organic Cayenne pepper :    1/8  of a ¼ TSP

-        Filtered or spring water :  12 OZ

Mix all the above, and drink slowly.

Tips

+ The amount of maple syrup is optional. U can reduce the amount, but DO NOT OVER DO it.

+ The amount of lemon on the other hand cannot be increased or reduced. 2 TBSP is the amount, and it is very important to stick with it.

+ The same is for water. It is important to mix the above ingredients with 12 OZ of water.

+ u can drink as many glasses as u like. Basically whenever u feel hungry u can make a new glass, and drink it. But each time u need to make a portion with the amount mentioned above.

How long should u do the cleanse?

The minimum time is 11 days, but u can continue doing it for weeks or even months. The longest time someone has done it is 18 months.

Tip

+ DO NOT STOP BEFORE 11 DAYS, since it will create difficulties for the body, and will make u sick.

Other sweeteners ?

The only sweetener that is allowed during this cleanse is MAPLE SYRUP. No sugar, no honey, no molasses, no agave, no apple juice, no stevia. Just MAPLE SYRUP.

Preparation

To have a more effective and pleasant experience it’s better to prepare ur body, so u will not go through a deep emotional experience or either physical discomfort. So lighten up your diet and food intake a few weeks before u start ur cleanse. By doing this u will prepare ur body not only emotionally, but also, physically. Ur stomach will be empty, and will make it easier for the body to go through the cleansing process.

Laxative teas, Sea Salt mixture, other Herbal Teas, and Water

During the time of the cleanse u can drink laxative teas, drink herbal teas, and water.

Vitamin, Mineral, and Supplements

No. Let the body does its job to go back to its natural way of being. It knows what to do, and does not need anything.

Other Foods

No. The only food is the lemonade that u make urself. Do not cheat. U will not need any other food. U r getting all u need by being on this diet.  And u will have more energy and clarity than u have ever had before.

Exercise

Yes. 30 min of cardio exercise. Also, body movement. Practices such as yoga, tai chi and chi gung, five Tibetan rites, walking, deep, connected breathing are all effective to keep u on track, feel good, and not lose ur faith while doing the cleanse.

Ending the cleanse

To end the cleanse, and go back to ur regular diet it is very important to be patience. If u decide to end ur cleanse after 11 days u need to start drinking apple juice for 3 days. Just drink the juice and water. Nothing else. After 3 days, start with soups. Then introduce some solid fruits and veggies to ur body, and stay on that for a few days. And little by little add some cooked food to ur diet.

Follow the guideline exactly, and u will have a pleasant experience.

Click here to go to the Reboundes page

My idea is that cancer doesn’t depend on mysterious causes (genetic, immunological or auto  immunological as the official oncology proposes, but it comes down from a simple fungal infection, whose destroying power in the deep tissues is actually under estimated.

Premise

The present work is based on the conviction, supported by many years of observations, comparisons and experiences, that the necessary and sufficient cause of the tumour is to be sought in the vast world of the fungi, the most adaptable, aggressive and evolved micro-organisms known in nature.
I have tried many times to explain this theory to leading institutions involved in cancer issues (the Ministry of Health, the Italian Medical Oncological Association, etc.) elaborating on my thinking, but I have been brushed aside because of the impossibility of setting my idea in a conventional context.
A different, international audience represents the possibility of sharing a view about health, which differs, from what is widely accepted by today’s medical community, either officially or from the sidelines.
There is an opposition between the allopathic and the Hippocratic medical ideal. The former has the disadvantage of its inability to consider the individual as a whole. Therefore it brings with it all the distortions and aberrations which such a point of view entails (excessive specialisation, therapeutic aggressiveness, superficiality, harmfulness etc.). The latter approach instead tends in the direction of being too generic, non-scientific, and devoid of therapeutic incisiveness.
The position that I promote represents instead a meeting point of these two conceptions of health, since, from the conceptual point of view, it sublimates and adds value to both, while highlighting how they both are victims of a common conformist language.
The hypothesis of a fungal aetiology in chronic-degenerative illness, able to connect the ethical qualities of the individual with the development of specific pathologies, reconciles the two orientations (allopathic and holistic) of medicine. The hypothesis is a strong candidate for being that missing element of psychosomatics that has been sought but never found by one of the fathers of psychosomatics, Wiktor Von Weiszäcker.
In considering the biological dimensions of the fungi, for instance, it is possible to compare the different degrees of pathogenicity in relation to the condition of organs, tissues and cells of a guest organism, which in turn also and especially depend on the behaviour of the individual.
Each time the recuperative abilities of a known psycho-physic structure are exceeded, there is an inevitable exposure, even considering possible accidental cofounders, to the aggression — even at the smallest dimensions — of those external agents that otherwise would be harmless.
In the presence of an indubitable connection between patient morale and disease it is no longer legitimate to separate the two domains (allopathic and naturopathic) which are both indispensable for improving the health of individuals.
The Platonic separation of the human mind from the human body, responsible for the present mechanistic and materialistic character of today’s medicine, is outdated. So is the pessimistic Kantian position concerning integration of the rational and emotional sides of man (“the starred sky above me, the moral law within me”), which generates the present myopia of today’s medical epistemology. With such outdated cognitive frameworks inevitably come all the mindsets that carry similar restrictive and limiting presuppositions.

Candida Albicans: Necessary and Sufficient Cause of Cancer

When facing the most pressing contemporary medical problem, cancer, the first thing to do is to admit that we still do not know its real cause. However treated in different ways by both official and alternative medicine, an aural of mystery still exists around its real generative process.
The attempt to overcome the present impasse must therefore and necessarily go through two separate phases: a critical one that exposes the present limitations of oncology, and a constructive one capable of proposing a therapeutic system based on a new theoretical point of departure.
In agreement with the most recent formulation of scientific philosophy, which suggests a counter-inductive approach where it is impossible to find a solution with the conceptual tools that are commonly accepted, only one logical formulation emerges; that is, to refuse the oncological principle which assumes cancer is generated by a cellular reproductive anomaly.
However, if the fundamental hypothesis of cellular reproductive anomaly is questioned, it becomes clear that all the theories based on this hypothesis are inevitably flawed.
It follows that both an auto-immunological process, in which the body’s defence mechanisms against external agents turn their destructive capacity against internal constituents of the body, and an anomaly of the genetic structure implicated in the development of auto-destruction, are inevitably disqualified.
Moreover, the common attempt to construct theories about multiple causes that have an oncogenic effect on cellular reproduction sometimes seems like a concealing screen, behind which there is nothing but a wall. These theories propose endless causes that are more or less associated with each other; and this means in reality that no valid causes are found. The invocation in turn of smoking, alcohol, toxic substances, diet, stress, psychological factors, etc., without a properly defined context, causes confusion and resignation, and creates even more mystification around a disease which may turn out to be simpler than it is depicted to be.
As background information, it is important to review the picture of presumed genetic influences in the development of cancer processes as they are depicted by molecular biologists. These are the scientists who perform research on infinitesimally small cellular mechanisms, but who in real life never see a patient. All present medical systems are based on this research, and thus, unfortunately, all therapies currently performed.
The main hypothesis of a genetic neoplastic causality is essentially reduced to the fact that the structures and the mechanism in charge of normal reproductive cellular activity become, for undefined causes, capable of an autonomous behaviour that is disjointed from the overall tissular economy.
The genes that normally have a positive role in cellular reproduction are, then, imprecisely referred to as proto-oncogenes; those which inhibit cellular reproduction are called suppressor genes or recessive oncogenes.
Both endogenous (never demonstrated) and exogenous cellular factors — that is, those carcinogenic elements that are usually invoked — are held responsible for the neoplastic degeneration of the tissues.
In J.H. Stein (Medicina Interna – Internal Medicine, Mosby Year Book inc.1994, St. Louis, Missouri, 4th edition, Milano, 1995, page 1186 -1187) the following is reported:
The mitogenic signals, from the microenvironment or from more distant areas of influence, are transmitted to the cells through numerous receptive structures that are associated to the plasmatic membrane.
Among these structures, the ones that have been studied most exhaustively are receptors with an external domain for the binder, a transmembranic domain and a cytoplasmatic domain with a thyrosinkinase activity.
Besides these, it is thought that at least seven distinct classes of molecules participate in the transmission of the mutagenic signal:
1) receptors coupled to G proteins
2) ionic channels
3) receptors with intrinsic activity guanil cyclase
4) receptors for many lymphofokines, cytokines and growth factors (interleukine, eritropoietine, etc.)
5) receptors for the phosphothyrosine phosphorilase activity
6) nuclear receptors belonging to the supergenic family of the receptor for steroidal estrogenic and thyroidal hormones
7) Finally, increasing numbers of tests suggest that the adhesion molecules expressed on the surface of the cells communicate with the microenvironment in ways that produce very important consequences for cellular growth and differentiation.
From a very superficial analysis of this presumed oncological picture, however, it seems to be clear how the assertion of all this unstoppable genetic hyperactivity, generated by elements that almost seem to lurk in the realms of the sinister and the monstrous, and that therefore suggest the existence of God-knows-what abysmal mechanisms that can only be deciphered with equally abysmal conceptual mechanisms — all this can do nothing more that unveil the abysmal stupidity that is at the basis of this way of conceiving things.
What is even more serious is the fact that nobody in the present health establishment seems to question the above-mentioned stupidities. All those who work in the field do nothing but repeat the stale litany of reproductive cellular anomalies on a genetic basis.
Since in this state of affairs the present medical theory shows an impoverishment and a superficiality that are indeed abysmal, it is better to look for new horizons and conceptual instruments that are capable of unearthing a real and unique neoplastic aetiology.
After so many years of failure and suffering it is time to rejuvenate minds with new and productive juices. Arguments for mysterious and complex genetic factors, a monstrous reproductive capacity by a pathologic entity capable of tearing apart any tissue, the idea that there is an implicit and ancestral tendency of the human organism to deviate in an auto-destructive sense — these and other similar arguments, spiced with exponentially multiplying numbers of “ifs” and “maybes” — it all has the flavour more of raving free-association than of a healthy scientific discourse.
Once the present oncological perspectives have been refuted, however, it is legitimate to ask how the successes achieved by official medicine and by alternative medicine have to be classified.
To this end, it is useful to remember that contemporary epistemology has demonstrated how the contributions to causality of contextual and co-textual elements of a theory, if they cannot be defined, are therefore chancy, especially in ultra-dimensional space, that is, in the microscopic dimension.
In practical terms, this means that data or positive facts that are considered proof when concerning a basic principle (for example, the above-mentioned cellular reproductive anomalies), and therefore obtained by utilising a limited number of variables next to the complexity of human disease, cannot be trusted, since they work only from the initial hypothetical functions.
Where, in fact, we admit the possibility of improvements or cures, it is not admissible from the logical point of view attribute them to this or that method of cure that is more of less official, since it is not possible to specify and include all or the majority of the components that are at play in the object man, in whom conditions of certainty cannot exist.
Paradoxically, the possible positive effect of each therapeutic system could derive from elements that are not foreseen and are unknown to all. Those elements, however, could be influenced by or determined to some extent by one another.
We may find ourselves in a position in which everybody rightfully has the right to promote his point of view, without knowing the real reasons for his successes.
In this case, then, even the most rigorous experimentation takes on a fictional character rather than the function of a true correspondence with reality, and the end result is a continuous sterile petitio principii.
If we then put aside completely the conceptual frame of contemporary oncology with all its interpretative variables of genetic, immuncological and toxicological character, what is left as the only logical, practicable way is the domain of the infectious diseases, to be seen and reconsidered with different eyes that has been the case so far.
Two considerations support such a conclusion. One is of a historical nature, and the other is of an epidemiological nature. The former derives from the fact that, in the therapeutical approach to the patient, the improvement in quality, that is the possibility of a real cure for the patient, has been determined almost exclusively by the development of microbiology. The latter derives from the analysis of life expectancy that has taken place in the last decades which, since it is associated with an inevitable change of the sthenicity of individuals, can be hypothesised as a determining factor in the development atypical infectious pathologies.
In order to find the possible carcinogenic ens morbi on the horizon of microbiology, it appears useful to return to the basic taxonomical concepts of biology, where we can see, incidentally, the existence of a noticeable amount of indecision and indetermination.
Already in the last century, a German biologist, Ernest Haeckele (1834-1919), departing from the Linnaeian concept that makes for two great kingdoms of living things (vegetable and animal) denounced the difficulties of categorising all those microscopic organisms which, because of their characteristics and properties, could not be attributed to either the vegetable or animal kingdom. For these organisms, he proposed a third kingdom, called Protists.
“This vast and complex world includes a range of entities beginning with those that have sub-cellular structure — existing at the limits of life — such as viroids and viruses, moving through the mycoplasms, to finally, organisms of greater organisation: bacteria, actinomycetes, mixomycetes, fungi, protozoa, and perhaps even some microscopic algae.” (2).
The common element of these organisms is the feeding system, which, being implemented (with very few exceptions) by direct absorption of soluble organic compounds, differentiates them both from animals and vegetables. Animals also feed as above, but especially by ingesting solid organic materials that are then transformed through the digestive process. Vegetables are capable, by utilising mineral compounds and light energy, to feed by synthesising the organic substances.
The contemporary tendency of biologists is to once again pick up, though in a more sophisticated way, the concept of the third kingdom. One goes even further, however, arguing that within that kingdom, fungi must be classified in a distinct category.
O. Verona (3) says that if we put multicellular organisms provided with photosynthetic capabilities (plants) in the first kingdom, and the organisms not provided with photosynthetic pigmentation (animals) in the second kingdom, and organisms from both these kingdoms are made of cells provided with a distinct nucleus (eukaryotes); and, furthermore, if we put in another kingdom (protists) those monocellular organisms that have no chlorophyll and have cells that are without a distinct nucleus (prokaryotes), the fungi can well have their own kingdom because of the absence of photosynthetic pigmentation, the ability to be mono-cellular, and multi-cellular, and, finally, their possession of a distinct nucleus.
Additionally, fungi possess a property that is strange when compared to all other micro-organisms: the ability to have a basic microscopic structure (hypha) with a simultaneous tendency to grow to remarkable dimensions (up to several kilograms), keeping unchanged the capacity to adapt and reproduce at any size.
From this point of view, therefore, fungi cannot be considered true organisms, but cellular aggregates sui generis with an organismic behaviour, since each cell maintains its survival and reproductive potential intact regardless of the structure in which it exists.
It is therefore clear how difficult it is to identify all the biological processes in such complex living realities. In fact, even today, there are huge voids and taxonomical approximations in mycology.
It is worthwhile to examine more deeply this strange world, with such peculiar characteristics, and try to highlight those elements that somehow may be pertinent to the problems of oncology.
1) Fungi are heterotrophic organisms and therefore need, as far as nitrogen and carbon are concerned, pre-formed compounds. Of these compounds, simple carbohydrates, for example monosaccarides (glucose, fructose, and mannose) are among the most utilised sugars. This means that fungi, during their life cycle, depend on other living beings, which must be exploited in different degrees for their feeding. This occurs both in a saprophytic way (that is, by feeding on organic waste) and in a parasitic way (that is, by attacking the tissue of the host directly).
2) Fungi show a great variety of reproductive manifestations (sexual, asexual, gemmation; these manifestations can often be observed simultaneously in the same mycete), combined with a great morphostructural variety of organs. All of this is directed toward the end of spore formation, to which the continuity and propagation of the species is entrusted.
3) In mycology, it is often possible to observe a particular phenomenon called heterocarion, characterised by the coexistence of normal and mutant nuclei in cells that have undergone a hyphal fusion.
Nowadays, phitopathologists are quite worried about the creation of individuals that are genetically quite different even from the parents. This difference has taken place by means of those reproductive cycles, which are called parasexual.
The indiscriminate use of phitopharmaceuticals has in fact often determined mutations of the nuclei of many parasite fungi with the consequent creation of heterocarion — and this is sometimes particularly virulent in its pathogenicity (4).
4) In the parasitic dimension, fungi can develop from the hyphas more or less beak-shaped specialised structures that allow the penetration of the host.
5) The production of spores can be so abundant as to always include, at every cycle, tens, hundreds, and even thousands of millions of elements that can be dispersed at a remarkable distance from the point of origin (a small movement is sufficient, for example, to implement immediate diffusion).
6) Spores have an immense resistance to external aggression, for they are capable of staying dormant in adverse conditions for many years, while preserving unaltered their regenerative potentialities.
7) The development coefficient of the hyphal apexes after the germination is extremely fast (100 microns per minute under ideal conditions) with ramification capacity, thus with the appearance of a new apex region that in some cases is in the neighbourhood of 40-60 seconds (6).
The shape of the fungus is never defined, for it is imposed by the environment in which the fungus develops.
It is possible to observe, for example, the same mycelium in the simple isolated hyphas status in a liquid environment or in the form of aggregates that are increasingly solid and compact up to the formation of pseudoparenchymas and of filaments and mycelial strings (7).
9) By the same token, it is possible to observe in different fungi the same shape whenever they must adapt to the same environment (this is called dimorphism).
The partial or total substitution of nourishing substances induces frequent mutations in fungi, and this is further proof of their high adaptability to any sub-strata.
10) When the nutritional conditions are precarious, many fungi react with hyphal fusion (among nearby fungi) which allows them to explore the available material more easily, using more complete physiological processes.
This property, which substitutes co-operation for competition, makes them distinct from any other microorganism, and for this reason Buller calls them social organisms (8).
11) When a cell gets old or becomes damaged (i.e. by a toxic substance or by a pharmaceutical) many fungi whose intercellular septums are provided with a pore react by implementing of a defence process called protoplasmic flux through which they transfer the nucleus and cytoplasm of the damaged cell into a healthy one, thus conserving unaltered all their biological potential.
12) The phenomena regulating the development of hyphal ramification are unknown to date (9). They consist either of a rhythmic development, or in the appearance of sectors which, though they originate from the hyphal system, are self-regulating (10), that is, independent of the regulating action and behaviour of the rest of the colony.
13) Fungi are capable of implementing an infinite number of modifications to their own metabolism in order to overcome the defence mechanism of the host. These modifications are implemented through plasmatic and biochemical actions as well as by a volumetric increase (hypertrophy) and numerical hyperplasy of the cells that have been attacked (11).
14) Fungi are so aggressive as to attack not only plants, animal tissue, food supplies and other fungi, but even protozoa, amoebas and nematodes.
Fungi hunt nematodes, for example, with peculiar hyphal modifications that constitute real mycelial criss-cross, viscose, or ring traps that achieve the immobilisation of the worms, as a precursor their hyphal invasion.
In some cases, the aggressive power of fungi is so great as to allow it, with only a cellular ring made up of three units, to tighten in its grip, capture and kill its prey in a short time notwithstanding the prey’s desperate struggling.
From the short notations above, therefore, it seems fair to dedicate a greater attention to the world of fungi, especially considering the fact that biologists and microbiologists constantly highlight large deficiencies and voids in all their descriptions and interpretations of the fungi’s shape, physiology and reproduction.
So the fungus, which is the most powerful and the most organised micro-organism known, seems to be an extremely logical candidate as a cause of neoplastic proliferation. Imperfect Fungi (so called because of the lack of knowledge and understanding of their biological processes) deserve particular attention since their essential prerogative sits in their fermentative capacity.
The greatest disease of mankind may therefore hide within the small cluster of pathogenic fungi, and may be after all be located with just some simple deductions able to close the circle and providing the solution.
Considering that, among the human parasite species, the Dermatophytes and Sporotrichum demonstrate an excessively specific morbidity, and that experience shows that Actinomycetes, Toluropsis and Hystoplasma rarely enter the context of pathology, the Candid Albicans clearly emerges as the sole candidate for tumoral proliferation.
If we stop for a second and reflect on its characteristics, we can observe many analogies with neoplastic disease. The most evident are:
1) Ubiquitous attachment: no organ or tissue is spared
2) The constant absence of hyperpyrexia
3) Sporadic and indirect involvement of the differential tissues
4) Invasiveness that is almost exclusively of the focal type
5) Progressive debilitation
6) Refractivity to any type of treatment
7) Proliferation facilitated by multiplicity of indifferent cofounders
Symptomatological basic configuration with structure tending to the chronic
Therefore an exceptionally high and diversified pathogenic potentiality exists in this mycete of just a few microns in size, which, even though it cannot be traced with the present experimental instruments, cannot be neglected from the clinical point of view.
Certainly, its present nosological classification cannot be satisfactory, because if we do not keep the possibly endless parasitic configurations in mind, that classification is too simplistic and constraining.
We therefore have to hypothesise that Candida, in the moment it is attacked by the immunological system of the host or by a conventional antimycotic treatment, does not react in the usual, predicted way, but defends itself by transforming itself into ever-smaller and non-differentiated elements that maintain their fecundity intact to the point of hiding their presence both to the host organism and to possible diagnostic investigations.
The Candida’s behaviour may be considered to be almost elastic:
When favourable conditions exist, it thrives on an epithelium; as soon as the tissue reaction is engaged, it massively transforms itself into a form that is less productive but impervious to attack — the spore.
If then continuous sub-epithelial solutions take place coupled with a greater a-reactivity in that very moment the spore gets deeper in the lower connective tissue in such an impervious state, it is irreversible.
In fact, the Candida takes advantage of a structural interchangeability utilising, according to the difficulties to overcome its biological niche.
In this way, Candida is free to expand to maturation in the soil, air, water, vegetation, etc., that is, wherever there is no antibody reaction.
In the epithelium, instead, it takes a mixed form, that is reduced to the sole spore component when it penetrates in the lower epithelial levels, where it tends to expand again in the presence of conditions tissular a-reactivity.
The initial mandatory step of an in-depth research endeavour would be to understand if and in which dimensions the spore transcends; what mechanisms it engages to hide itself or, again, if it preserves its parasitical characteristic, or if it has available a neutral quiescent position, which is difficult or even impossible to detect by the immunological system.
Unfortunately today we do not have the appropriate means, either theoretical or technical, to answer these and similar questions, so that the only valid suggestions can come solely from clinical observation and experience. While not providing immediate solutions, these sources can at stimulate further questions.
Assuming that Candida Albicans is the agent responsible for tumoral development, a targeted therapy would keep into account not just its static and macroscopic manifestations, but even the ultramicroscopic ones especially in their dynamic valence, that is, the reproductive.
It is very probable that the targets to attack are the fungi’s dimensional transition points in order to perform a decontamination with such a scope as to include the whole spectrum of the biological expression: parasitic, vegetative, sporal, and even ultra-dimensional and, to the limit, viral.
If we stop at the most evident phenomena, we risk administering salves and unguents forever (in the case of dermatomycosis or in psoriasis), or to clumsily attack (with surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy) enigmatic tumoral masses with the sole result of facilitating their propagation, which is already heightened in the mycelial forms.
Why, one may ask, should we assume a different and heightened activity of Candida Albicans since it has been abundantly described in its pathological manifestations?
The answer lies in the fact that it has been studied only in a pathogenic context, that is, only in relation to the epithelial tissues. In reality Candida possesses an aggressive valence that is diversified in function of the target tissue. It is just in the connective or in the connective environment, in fact, and not in the differentiated tissues, that Candida may find conditions favourable to an unlimited expansion.
This emerges if we stop and reflect for a moment on the main function of connective tissue, which is to convey and supply nourishing substances to the cells of the whole organism.
This is to be considered as an environment external to the more differentiated cells such as nervous, muscular, etc. It is in this context, in fact, that the alimentary competition takes place.
On one hand we have the organism’s cellular elements trying to defeat all forms of invasion; on the other hand, we have fungal cells trying to absorb ever-growing quantities of nourishing substances, for they have to obey the species’ biological imperative to form ever-larger and diffused masses and colonies.
From the combination of various factors pertinent both to the host and the aggressor, it is possible to hypothesise the evolution of a candidosis;
First stage Integer epitheliums, absence of the debilitating factors
Candida can only exist as saprophyte

Second Non-integer epitheliums (erosions, abrasions, etc.), absence of

stage debilitating factors, unusual transitory conditions (acidosis, metabolic disorder, and microbial disorder).

Candida expands superficially (classic mycosis, both exogenous and endogenous).

Third Non-integer epitheliums, presence of debilitating factors (toxic,

stage radiant, traumatic, neuropsychic, etc.).

Candida goes deeper into the sub-epithelial levels from which it can be carried to the whole organism through the blood and lymph (intimate mycosis). (12)

Stages one and two are the most studied and known, while stage three, though it has

been described in its morphological diversity, is reduced to a silent form of saprophytism.

This is not acceptable from a logical point of view, because no one can demonstrate the

harmlessness of the fungal cells in the deepest parts of the organism.

In fact, the assumption that Candida can behave in the same saprophytic manner that is

observed on integer epitheliums when it has successfully penetrated the lower levels is

at least risky, because the assumption would have to be sustained by concepts that are

totally aleatory.

In fact, we asked not only to accept a priori that the connective environment is (a) not suitable to nourish the Candida, but also at the same time to accept (b) the omnipotence of the body’s defence system towards an organic structure that is invasive but that then becomes vulnerable once lodged in the deeper tissues.
As to point a), it is difficult to imagine that a micro-organism so able to adapt itself to any sub-strata cannot find elements to support itself in the human organic substance; by the same token, it seems risky to hypothesise that the human organism’s defence system is totally efficient at every moment of its existence.
Finally, the assumption that there is a tendency to a state of quiescence and vulnerability in the case of a pathogenic agent such as fungus — the most invasive and aggressive microorganism existing in nature — seems to carry a whiff of irresponsible.
It is therefore urgent, on the basis of the above-mentioned considerations, to recognise the hazardous nature of such a pathogenic agent, which is capable of easily taking the most various biological configurations, both biochemical and structural, in function of the condition of the host organism.
The fungal expansion gradient in fact becomes steeper as the tissue that is the host of the mycotic invasion becomes less eutrophic, and thus less reactive.
To that end, it seems useful to briefly consider the “benign tumour” nosological entity. This is an issue that always appears in general pathology but that indeed is brushed aside most of the time too easily, and it is overlooked, since it usually doesn’t create either problems or worries. It constitutes one of those underestimated grey areas seldom subjected to rational, fresh consideration.
If the benign tumour, however, is not considered a full-fledged tumour, it would be advantageous, for clarity, to categorise it in an appropriate nosological scheme. If, instead, it is thought that it fully belongs to neoplastic pathology, then it is necessary to consider its non-invasive character and consequently to consider the reasons for this.
It is in fact evident how in this second scenario, the thesis based on a presumed predisposition of the organism to auto-phagocytosis, having to admit an expressive graduation, would stumble into such additional difficulties such as to become extremely improbable.
By contrast, in the fungal scenario, the mystery of why there are benign and malignant tumours is exhaustively solved, since they can be recognised as having same etiological genesis.
The benignity or malignancy of a cancer in fact depends on the capability of tissular reaction of a specific organ expressing itself ultimately in the ability to encyst fungal cells, and to prevent them from developing in ever-larger colonies. This can be achieved more easily where the ratio between differentiated cells and connective tissue is in favour of the former.
Situated between the impervious noble tissues, then, and the defenceless connective, the differentiated connective structures (the glandular structures in particular) represent that medium term which is only somewhat vulnerable to attack, because of an ability to offer a certain type of defence.
And it is in these conditions that benign tumours are formed, that is, where the glandular connective tissue is successful in forming hypertrophic and hyperplastic cellular embankments against the parasites.
In the stomach and in the lung, instead, since there are no specific glandular units, the target organ, provided with a small defensive capability, is at the mercy of the invader. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning how several types of intimate fungal invasion do not determine the appearance of malignant or benign tumours, but a type of particular benign tumour (specific degenerative alterations) as is the case of some organs or apparatuses that do not have peculiar glandular structures, but nevertheless are attacked in their connective tissue, but in a limited way.
If we consider, in fact, multiple sclerosis, SLA, psoriasis, nodular panartherite, etc. the possible development of the fungus in a three-dimensional sense is actually limited by the anatomic configuration of the invaded tissues, so that only a longitudinal expansion is allowed.
Going back to the precondition of a-reactivity that is necessary for neoplastic development in a specific individual, it is permissible to affirm how in the human body each external or internal element that determines a reduction of well-being in an organism, organ or tissue, possesses oncogenic potentiality. This is not so much because of an intrinsic damaging capability as much as for a generic property of favouring the fungal (that is, tumoral) flourishing.
Then the causal network so much invoked in contemporary oncology, which involves toxic, genetic, immunological, psychological, geographical, moral, social, and other factors, finds a correct classification only in a mycotic infectious perspective where the arithmetical and diachronic summation of harmful elements works as a cofactor to the external aggression.
Having theoretically demonstrated the equivalency tumour = fungus, it is clear how this interpretative key offers a long series of questions concerning the contemporary therapies both oncological (used without reference indexes) and antimycotic (utilised only at a superficial level).
Which path is best to walk today, then, when faced with a cancer patient, since the conventional oncological treatment, not being etiological, can only occasionally have positive effects and most of the time produces damage?
In the fungal perspective in fact, the effectiveness of surgery is noticeably reduced because of the extreme diffusibility and invasiveness characteristic of a mycelial conglomerate. Surgery’s to solve the problem is therefore tied to the case — to conditions, that is, in which one has the luck to completely remove the entire colony (which is often possible in the presence of a sufficient encystment; but here we are in the case of benign tumours).
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy produce almost exclusively negative effects, both for their specific ineffectiveness, and for their high toxicity and harmfulness to the tissues, which in the last analysis favours mycotic aggressiveness.
By contrast, an anti-fungal, anti-tumour specific therapy would keep into account the importance of the connective tissue, together with the reproductive complexity of fungi. Only by attacking the fungi across the spectrum of all its forms, at points where it is most vulnerable from the nutritional point of view, would it be possible to hope to eradicate them from the human organism.
The first step to take, therefore, would be to reinforce the cancer patient with generic reconstituent measures (nutrition, tonics, regulation of rhythms and vital functions), that are able to enhance, by themselves, the general defences of the organism.
Concerning the possibility of having available pharmaceutical cures which unfortunately do not exist today, it seems useful, in the attempt to find an anti-fungal substance that is quite diffusible and therefore effective, to consider the extreme sensitivity of Candida towards sodium bicarbonate (i.e. in the oral candidosis of breasted babies). This is consistent with the fact that Candida has an accentuated ability to reproduce in an acid environment.
Theoretically, therefore, if treatments that put the fungus in direct contact with high bicarbonate concentrations could be found, we should be able to see a regression of the tumoral masses.
And this is what happens in many types of tumour, such as colon, liver — and especially stomach and lung — the former susceptible to regression just because of its “external” anatomic position, the latter because of the high diffusibility of sodium bicarbonate in the bronchial system and for its high responsiveness to general reconstituent measures.
By applying a similar therapeutic approach, it has been possible in some patients (about 30 in the last 15 years) to achieve complete remission of the symptomatology and normalisation of the instrumental data.
Following are the reports of seven cases of patients, some of whom survived more than 10 years.
It is important to emphasise that these cases are presented just as an example of what could be a new way of perceiving the complexity of medical problems, especially in oncology.
It is clear, in fact, that because of the very limited number of cases, the lack of documentation showing rigid, orthodox experimental methodology, and the long time that has elapsed since these cases were treated, that the evidence required for strong support of this theory on cancer is lacking.
I will not indicate in this paper the personal, cultural and professional reasons that were responsible for the interruption of the study and cure of cancer patients until recently (that is, until two or three years ago, when I resumed the treatment of cancer cases). I am however convinced that the important fact that some patients have been able to heal and survive for several years with therapies that are different from the common, deadly therapeutic methods, must be divulged. This is especially because these results come from a new way of thinking which, as opposed to groping in the dark as official and various alternative medicines do, has a well-defined subject — fungi — in a theory which of course is still to be proven and validated.
One may ask why more recent cases are not shown below. This is because insufficient time has elapsed since treatment for a demonstration of long-term well being of the patients, and therefore these cases are not included.
It is also important to highlight that nowadays it is very difficult to have a large number of cases, since it is not easy to obtain a large number of cancer patients — they are addressed by the current system almost exclusively toward the official channels of medicine, even if in many cases those have been proven ineffective or deadly.
Keeping the above in mind, I consider it useful to describe these cases as follows:
Case 1: A 70-year old female patient with diagnosis of stomach adenocarcinoma confirmed by commonly accepted oncological tests (TAK, biopsy, etc.). Two days before the scheduled operation, she accepts the suggestion of trying a less sanguinary approach, and leaves the hospital.
For the period of a month, she is administered sodium bicarbonate (one teaspoon in a glass of water) to ingest half an hour before breakfast (that is, on an empty stomach) for the purpose of maximising the effect.
After about two months normalisation of the gastric function takes place with attenuation at first, and eventual loss of all the symptomatology related to neoplastic pathology (lack of appetite, digestion troubles, fatigue, lipothymic events, etc.).
After an endoscopic examination performed one year after the beginning of therapy, the total remission of neoplastic formation is ascertained and the patient refuses further investigation.
The patient is still alive today, 15 years after the treatment.
Case 2: A 67-year-old patient with a long history of gastric ulcer is diagnosed with stomach cancer and a gastrectomy is suggested.
The patient, believing his disease is just an exacerbation of the ulcer, wants to find an alternative to surgery. He therefore accepted a therapy with sodium bicarbonate as in case 1. The therapy determines in a few months the regression of the neoplastic symptomatology.
After about 18 months, during which no check-up is performed, upon the return of symptomatology, treatment is resumed as above. Gastric functionality is quickly re-established and maintained for about eight years, after which contact with the patient is lost.
Case 3: A 58-year-old patient with stomach carcinoma is diagnosed through histological examination performed on endoscopical sample.
The patient chooses not to undergo the conventional therapies and he decides to accept a therapy similar to that in the two preceding cases. The resulting effect is a normalisation of symptomatology for about three years, that is, until there are no further medical check-ups.
Case 4: In September, 1983, a 71-year-old patient undergoes a hospital check-up in a serious condition of emaciation caused by a large weight loss (about 15 Kgs.) which occurred over the prior few months.
Once a stomach neoplastic condition has been diagnosed, and after the layout of a combined oncological therapeutic scheme, the relatives are informed. The relatives are also informed of the difficulties and risks of such treatment, to be administered to such a debilitated patient.
The wife decides to refuse the conventional approach and decides to bring the husband home and try the “harmless” therapy of baking soda, which is administered in a lower dosage than in the preceding cases. That restores appetite and a satisfactory digestive functionality.
For about eight months the patient has difficulty regaining weight. After this, the improvement is more and more evident, with the almost complete regaining of the lost weight (within 24 months) and a considerable improvement of the patient’s general condition.
Case 5: A 51-year-old patient diagnosed at the end of 1983 with bronchial carcinoma in the lower right lobe has the diagnosis confirmed by routine oncological tests (distinctively positive TAK but negative bronchial residue. Surgery is proposed.
The family decides to delay surgery and try the bicarbonate treatment.
Radiological examination is performed 18 months after the treatment. During these months there are no emophtoic episodes as occurred at the beginning of the disease. The radiological examination still indicates the presence of a nodular mass in the lower part of the right lobe, but its dimensions appear to be smaller and the contours of the mass more regular.
Case 6: A 48-year-old patient with tumour in the middle lobe of the lung that has been confirmed by all oncological examinations is put on a waiting list for surgery at the beginning of 1983. Incidentally, the execution modality does not seem to be completely defined because the neoplastic mass exceeds the limits.
The patient leaves the hospital against the advice of doctors – to the point that the doctors look for him for several months. He then submits to a bicarbonate therapy which is able to re-establish healthy conditions.
A radiological examination performed after nine months reveals that the neoplastic mass has been replaced by a tenuous transversal line located at the base of the medium lobe that can be interpreted as a residual scar.
The patient is still living.
Case 7: In 1981, a 55-year-old patient is affected by rectal neoplasy that has been evidentiated through symptoms such as problems with evacuation and bleeding, and, instrumentally, through endoscopic examination. Doctors suggest rectal resection and consequent surgical construction of a preternatural anus. In the attempt to avoid this mutilation, the patient submits to a local therapy with bicarbonate performed with enemas containing a high bicarbonate solution — 8 teaspoons per litre.
Three years after the treatment, the patient was still living.

Critical considerations

Having explained the theory and having briefly illustrated the cases, it seems appropriate to analyse, in a critical and self-critical spirit, what may emerge in neoplastic pathology that is new and concrete.
If we closely observe the proposed therapeutic approach it is possible to see that, independently of its real effectiveness, it has value as an innovative theory. First, it challenges the present methodology and especially its assumptions. Second, it offers a concrete alternative proposal to a mountain of conjectures and postures that sound authoritative but are too generic and therefore ineffective.
The identification of one tumoral cause, even with all the possible general provisos, would represent a step forward that is indispensable for escaping that passivity determined by a lack of results, and which is responsible for medical behaviours that are based too much on faith and not enough on real confidence.
Given, therefore, that an unconventional medical approach can benefit some patients better – from any point of view – than the official treatments, and since valuable results can be demonstrated, this should stimulate us to pursue further research while avoiding patronising postures that are both limiting and non-productive.
We can therefore discuss whether or not sodium bicarbonate is the real reason for the recoveries or if, instead, those recoveries are due to the interaction of a number of conditions that have been created, the results of unidentified neuro-psychical factors, or maybe the results of something totally unknown. What is beyond question, however, is the fact that a certain number of people, by not following conventional methods, have been able to go back to normality without suffering and without mutilation.
The message of this experience is therefore a call to search for those solutions that are in accord with the simple Hippocratic premise of man’s “well-being”; that is, we must be a stimulated to a critical evaluation of our contemporary oncological therapies which indubitably can guarantee suffering.
One thing is certain: nowadays it is no longer legitimate (for we are the prey of panic and of the “tumoral syndrome”), to tolerate the slaughtering of patients in the name of a “compassionate” obligation to help and be helped, without the support of solid etiological foundations.
If, for a moment, we take a different point of view and try to look at the world of the tumour with new eyes, that is, by hypothesising a simpler genesis of neoplastic proliferation, even the fungal one, we may be appalled and frightened by the ignorant hand of official medicine – a hand that is armed, however, with great cynicism and profound superficiality.
One could argue that the failures represent the inevitable price to pay to save people’s lives. But when the suffering and the “authorised deaths” overwhelm the patient recoveries (that seem, indeed, to be random or due to factors not related to the therapies performed), then it is no longer acceptable to operate at all costs and regardless of the consequences, for in doing so, we are destined only to hurt people.
One can rebut that the recoveries obtained by using present oncological protocols are not so few, and that in certain types of tumour recoveries are a high percentage. It is easy to see, however, that these results are nothing but the outcome of propaganda sustained by surreptitious argumentation shedding false light on the subject of tumoral nosological entities.
When we group together both malignant tumours that are occasionally or never healed (such as lung and stomach), tumours that border with benignity (such as the majority of thyroid and prostatic tumours, etc.) or put them together with those that have an autonomous positive outcome notwithstanding chemotherapy (i.e. infantile leukaemia) – all of this appears to be devious and misleading, having only the purpose of forging a consensus that would otherwise be impossible to obtain with intellectually ethical behaviour.
If, for example, out of a certain number of tumour species only one is susceptible to regression, it is not legitimate to create a nosologic diagram reporting on the global incidence of applied therapeutics regardless of the total neoplasm’s. In fact, it would be more appropriate to report the uselessness, even the harmfulness of doing so, and leave an open field for alternative hypotheses as far as the demonstration of positive behaviour by the heteroplasm is concerned.
If, for example, we go back for a moment to infantile leukaemia, the frequent positive outcomes can be correlated with elements that are extraneous to the therapies administered. For example, they can be correlated with those common supportive therapies, which are considered particularly effective in young organisms. They can be correlated with the ability of the connective tissue to acquire, in a particular stage of growth and development, that maturity which is necessary to the strengthening of an immunological activity that is, at a certain point in life, intrinsically insufficient.
It is in fact frequent in medicine that some diseases disappear spontaneously, without apparent reason, but in correlation with certain transitions of organic maturation.
On the oncological-mycological issue, it is known how psoriasis and some chronic and recurrent mycoses of infancy that reject any treatment suddenly, at a certain stage of the body’s development, disappear completely without a trace.
From the examples noted, which could be uselessly multiplied ad infinitum, it is evident that the full panorama of tumoral disease is extremely varied and complex. It follows that, taking postures that are exclusive or preclusive, whether they are conventional or unconventional, may indicate a lack of vision. This is especially so since the terrain we are exploring is largely unknown, and therefore cannot be charted in a way that is uniform or standardised.
Wherever we consider an environment occupied by invisible ultra-microscopic elements, and since the structure of knowledge must inevitably rest on the construction of a multiplicity of theoretical entities, there is a risk of slipping from a perception that reflects reality to one that is merely fictional. The acceptance of such a fictional construct may become a pernicious reality.
The fact that modern medicine not only cannot offer sufficient interpretative criteria but even uses dangerous methodologies that are also harmful and meaningless – even if carried out with good faith – is something which must push us all to search for humane and logical alternatives. At the same time, it is necessary to carefully, open-mindedly, and logically consider any theory or point of view that is dared to be advanced in the battle against that monstrous and inhuman yoke that is the tumour.
To this end, a note of acknowledgement is to go to all those who are aware of the harmfulness of conventional therapeutic methods and constantly try to find alternative solutions.
People like Di Bella, Govallo and others, though guilty of utilising the same inauspicious principles of official medicine (thus showing an excessively conformist mindset) are actually using common sense by trying to relieve the suffering of cancer patients through the use of painless methodologies and, in some cases, are able to achieve remissions even though in the dark about the real causes of cancer.
In an alternative perspective, then, it would be necessary to conceive a new approach to experimentation in the oncological field, setting epidemiological, etiological, pathogenical, clinical and therapeutical research in line with a renewed microbiology and mycology that would probably drive to the conclusion already illustrated; that is, the tumour is a fungus – the Candida Albicans.
The possible discovery that not only tumours but also the majority of chronic degenerative disease could be reconciled to mycotic causality would represent a qualitative quantum leap, which, by revolutionising medical thinking, could greatly improve life expectancy and quality of life. Such reconciliation might include a wider spectrum of fungal parasites (for example, in diseases of the connective tissues, multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, some epileptic forms, diabetes II, etc.).
In closing, if the world of fungi – those most complex and aggressive micro-organisms – has until now too often been bypassed and left unobserved, the hope of this work is that we will quickly become aware of the hazards of these micro-organisms so that medical resources can be channelled not up blind alleys but toward the real enemies of the human organism: external infectious agents.
Notes:
1) Feyerabend P.K., “Contro il metodo”, Milano 1994, page 26
2) Verona O., “Il vasto mondo dei funghi”, Bologna 1985, page 1
3) Ibid., page2
4) Rambelli A., “Fondamenti di micologia”, Bologna 1981, page 35
5) Ibid.
6) Ibid., page 28
7) Verona O., cit. page 5
Rambelli A., cit. page 31
9) Ibid., page 28
10) Ibid., page 29
11) Ibid., page 266
12) Ibid., page 273

Therapy with sodium bicarbonate solutions. The fundamental reason and the motives that suggest a therapy with sodium bicarbonate against tumours is that, although with the concurrence of a myriad of variable concausal factors – the development and the local and remote proliferation of these tumours has a cause that is exclusively fungin.
At the moment, against fungi there is no useful remedy other than, in my opinion, sodium bicarbonate. The anti-fungins that are currently on the market, in fact, do not have the ability to penetrate the masses (except perhaps early administrations of azoli or of amfotercin B delivered parenterally), since they are conceived to act only at a stratified level of epithelial type. They are therefore unable to affect myceliar aggregations set volumetrically and also masked by the connectival reaction that attempts to circumscribe them.

We have seen that fungi are also able to quickly mutate their genetic structure. That means that after an initial phase of sensitivity to fungicides, in a short time they are able to codify them and to metabolise them without being damaged by them – rather, paradoxically, they extract a benefit from their high toxicity on the organism.
This happens, for example, in the prostateinvasive carcinoma with congealed pelvis. For this affliction, there is a therapy with anti-fungins which at first is very effective at the symptomatological level but through time it consistently loses its effectiveness.

Sodium bicarbonate, instead, as it is extremely diffusible and without that structural complexity that fungi can easily codify, retains for a long time its ability to penetrate the masses. This is also and especially due to the speed at which it disintegrates them, which makes fungi’s adaptability impossible, thus it cannot defend itself. A therapy with bicarbonate should therefore be set up with strong dosage, continuously, and with pauseless cycles in a destruction work which should proceed from the beginning to the end without interruption for at least 7-8 days for the first cycle, keeping in mind that a mass of 2-3-4 centimetres begins to consistently regress from the third to the fourth day, and collapses from the fourth to the fifth.

Generally speaking, the maximum limit of the dosage that can be administered in a session gravitates around 500 cc of sodium bicarbonate at five per cent solution, with the possibility of increasing or decreasing the dosage by 20 per cent in function of the body mass of the individual to be treated and in the presence of multiple localisations upon which to apportion a greater quantity of salts.

We must underline that the dosages indicated, as they are harmless, are the very same that have already been utilised without any problem for more than 30 years in a myriad of other morbid situations such as:

• Severe diabetic ketoacidosis
• Cardio-respiratory reanimation
• Pregnancy
• Haemodialysis
• Peritoneal dialysis
• Pharmacological toxicosis
• Hepatopathy
• Vascular surgery

With the aim to reach the maximum effect, sodium bicarbonate should be administered directly on the neoplastic masses which are susceptible of regression only by destroying the fungal colonies.
This is possible by the selective arteriography (the visualisation through instrumentation of specific arteries) and by the positioning of the arterial port-a-cath (these devices are small basins used to join the catheter). These methods allow the positioning of a small catheter directly in the artery that nourishes the neoplastic mass, allowing the administration of high dosages of sodium bicarbonate in the deepest recesses of the organism.

With this method, it is possible to reach almost all organs; they can be treated and can benefit from a therapy with bicarbonate salts which is harmless, fast, and effective with only the exception of some bone areas such as vertebrae and ribs, where the scarce arterial irrigation does not allow sufficient dosage to reach the targets.
Selective arteriography therefore represents a very powerful weapon against fungi that can always be used against neoplasias, firstly because it is painless and leaves no after effects, secondly because the risks are very low.

It is important that you achieve 2-3 bowel movements before beginning a parasite cleanse. If not you will need to find a good colon cleanser before or during the program. Some products have what’s needed to sweep the colon in their program. These are noted. Enemas and colonics are also recommended.

These programs all differ in duration. It is generally understood that to kill yeasts, parasites, their eggs & larvae requires 30 days or longer. This information will be helpful in finding a program for eliminating parasites that is right for you. Take a look, do your own research and choose one that is right for you.

Clearing the body of parasites and yeasts is a journey which will result in overall improvement in your physical and mental functioning and will probably change your life. Stick with it, you’re worth it. Happy cleansing!!

PARASITE CLEANSE INFORMATION
Osage Natural health Center 870-423-4237

We don’t think twice about de-worming our pets or livestock on a regular basis. The human body is just as prone to parasite infestation as the animals around us. Some of the many symptoms can be: Headache, Nervousness, Anxiety, Irritability, Fatigue, Digestive, Disorders, Teeth Grinding, Intestinal Disorders,  Chronic Itchiness, Skin Eruptions,  Liver/Pancreas Disorders, Hormonal Imbalances.

Quite frequently, we are exposed to parasites and/or their eggs. Dining in a restaurant while the floor is being swept, having a relationship with our pets, solvent exposure, consuming ill prepared food and just the normal daily breathing in of dust in the air are just a few of many ways we are bombarded with these potentially deadly creatures called parasites.

There are four main categories or sizes of parasites that infiltrate the human body: large, small, micro, and cellular. We deal with “ALL” of them in our cleansing programs. Each program is “specifically tailored” to your body for specific parasite supplements and length of time needed (40 – 50 days is average) .

DE-P is usually at the foundation of our cleanses. It has been clinically proven to be an effective broad spectrum anti-parasitic as well as anti-fungal (including Candida albicans). It has also been clinically proven in treating viruses and even some bacterium. PARASITE CLEANSE INFORMATION – Get your own specific protocol call: Osage Natural health Center 870-423-4237

Since parasites usually have an affinity for weakened areas of the body, we generally support one or more of those areas depending on your needs. Our goal is to help you come through the cleanse in the best way possible so “you” may celebrate life to the fullest.

Pure Body Institute – “Para-Cleanse” & “Colon Booster” – 1-800-952-7873 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              1-800-952-7873      end_of_the_skype_highlighting www.pbiv.com

Dr. J’s Detox Products-Yeast-Para Control – www.drjshealthnet.com Designed for use with Cleansing-Balance Tea to clear debris. Click on “Health Maintenance Recommendations” for great info.

Nature’s Secret-“Parastroy”- Has internal sweep w/product. Purchase at health food stores, or go to www.vitacost.com for discount price.

  Renew-Life-“Para-Gone” – Purchase at health-food stores or go to www.renewlife.com  “Fiber-Smart” & “Para-Zyme” must be bought separately for colon sweep & enzymes.

  Dr. Natura – “Colonix” – Intestinal cleanser & parasite cleanse in one; www.drnatura.com

  Herbal Gardens ’-“Inner Purity” – www.thelifetree.com “Inner Clarity” is recommended first if you’re not having 2-3 bowel movements a day.

  Dr. Hulda Clarke’s Parasite Cleanse – Go to www.drclarkstore.com . Go to www.drclarkia.com for a very simple, potent tincture.

  Gaia Herbs (or any brand)-“Black Walnut/Wormwood” tincture.- Easy to take drops. Purchase at health food stores or they may have their own brand; should have Black Walnut, Wormwood & Cloves.

  Blessed Herbs-Parasite Elimination Kit; www.blessedherbs.com click on “Cleansing Kits”

  Arise & Shine Parasite Cleanse; www.ariseandshine.com, or contact Carl Barna @ 858-518-6999

These are suggestions and informational only.
Always consult your doctor or qualified health care practitioner.

Preface

Before we go diving off in to the deep end of the pool…

Just wanted to share a few thoughts with you before you find yourself sailing along in the bright new world of hydrogen peroxide…

First.

Hydrogen peroxide is what it is because it is what it is. Does that sound redundant? Actually, it’s not. H2O2, as it’s chemically named, is a chemical compound.

It is created in our atmosphere as a natural process, as well as in our bodies, in plants and generally… all over the place.

But we humans have this capacity to take simple chemical compounds like hydrogen peroxide… and make them stronger.

So all the great advice in this ebook IS great. Use it. Apply it. And experiment… a little.

But don’t forget that you’re dealing with a very powerful organic chemical compound that, in high concentrations, is an oxidizer. That means it burns.

At concentrations higher than 5% it can cause permanent eye damage. So don’t put it in your eye!

And respect the fact that it is strong in human created dosages. 35% hydrogen peroxide kills all microbial and bacteria life on contact in less than 20 seconds.

If you’re battling the creeping crud of all mildews… that’s terrific! If you’re not careful how you handle it, that’s not.

Common sense is, unfortunately, not a salable commodity. So, just please, don’t be illogical. Think science.

If you find yourself getting sloppy in your conduct, just remember…

You may be playing with 8%, 10%, even 35% hydrogen peroxide…

Those space shuttles are launching off the pure stuff… it IS that powerful.

A little respect is not so much to ask.

1. Over 3%: Wear gloves. Don’t inhale mist. Ventilate area for large applications.
2. Even at 3%: Don’t inhale the mist, ventilate, let it work without working on you.
3. Any applications of eardrops, etc. never use stronger than 3% solutions.

It’s like all great and good things in life. Some is wonderful, and applied correctly it gives nothing but joy. Too much makes trouble. No one thing is good all the time.

So, use hydrogen peroxide with an awareness and respect of its power, and it

will serve you very very well.

Now that we’ve got that out of the way…

Let’s talk about what is right, good and sensible about hydrogen peroxide.

You see, that’s where all the good stuff is.

Whether you are working with liquid hydrogen peroxide or sodium percarbonate dry compounds, the results and the outcomes are the same:

1. The oxidizing power will work when you apply it.
2. The same power will break down in water (any flow of water) almost instantly.
3. The end result of all actions of hydrogen peroxide will be water and oxygen, non-lethal, non polluting, non invasive, and not proliferating of toxic by-products in the environment.

Even if you really mess up and pour 35% hydrogen peroxide on your foot instead of into the hot tub… Running water will mitigate any problem without long-term ill effects.

The inverse of the nuclear age, hydrogen peroxide, even if in concentrated form, once exposed to the natural environment will quickly, readily and reliably break down to common elements, which are non-toxic and life sustaining rather than life threatening.

If you want more of the details check the Appendices for reference materials.

Keeping Your Home Clean, Beautiful, and Healthy

Introduction

The wonders of cleaning and personal care with hydrogen peroxide are as surprising for their variety as for their efficacy. A naturally occurring compound, hydrogen peroxide is formed within the cell structures of plants and animals, in the earth’s atmosphere and in the waters that cover the earth.

Formed in the upper atmosphere when water and ozone combine to produce oxygen and hydrogen peroxide, its true chemical role in the mechanism of climate and rainfall is far from being clearly understood even today.

As a commercial chemical it was first used in the restoration of famous paintings to remove sulphur build up without damage to the paint or canvas beneath. It has been long favored in textiles pulping, fabric production and bleaching for its ability to whiten with minimal damage to fiber structures, and has been used as an environmentally sustainable replacement for chlorine bleaching in many paper and pulp operations around the world.

Hydrogen peroxide is manufactured, stored and shipped all over the world in vast quantities, yet its application as a simple and effective household chemical cleaning compound has never really come of age.

Clearly, hydrogen peroxide is a healthy, environmentally clean and sound approach to not only clean bleaching of paper pulp; cleaning of hydroponics and water garden waters, aquaculture and other industries, but is equally useful around the home. Perhaps the first thing you’ll notice once you begin using hydrogen peroxide for your household needs is a distinct lack of odor. No smells of perfumes, chlorine, cleaners, pet, or bathroom odors… Instead there will be a simple clean sweetness of additional oxygen and fresh clean air.

What else can this little wonder couple do around the home? The easiest way to understand the vast array of practical applications of hydrogen peroxide is to take a closer look at what it is, and how it interacts with the rest of the world.

Hydrogen Peroxide: H2O2

Hydrogen (H) and Oxygen (O) – building blocks of the natural world. What makes hydrogen peroxide preferable to Chlorine, Ammonia, Window Cleaner, Oven Cleaner, Pine Cleaner, Branded Disinfectants, Toilet Bowl Cleaners, and Chemical Abrasives.

Unlike chlorine, ammonia and other toxic cleaning products, hydrogen peroxide breaks down into water and oxygen. The two elements that make up hydrogen peroxide (hydrogen and oxygen) in their most common form make water (H2O).

Hydrogen peroxide was discovered by French Chemist Louis-Jacques Thenard in 1818. Coining the phrase “eau oxygenee” to describe its properties, Thenard believed it to be an oxygenated form of oxygen.

Hydrogen peroxide is produced naturally within plant biomass and plays diverse and pivotal roles within the plant kingdom. It is present in trace amounts in rain, water, and snow. It is also present in higher concentrations in such natural healing springs as Lourdes, Fatima and St. Anne’s.

Oxidation:

An oxidizing agent is a chemical compound that readily transfers oxygen atoms. Hydrogen peroxide is a common oxidizing agent. It breaks down readily in water, becoming water and oxygen as the oxidizing agent releases its extra oxygen atom. This action of releasing the extra oxygen atom bound in the hydrogen peroxide is what is defined as oxidation.

Without water to dilute the effect, highly concentrated formulas of hydrogen peroxide are volatile, unstable, caustic and downright powerful. It is this powerful action that makes hydrogen peroxide an exceptional rocket and space ship propellant. The simple power of oxidation when concentrated becomes capable of creating enough energy to lift spaceships off of launch pads and into outer space.

Simple yet effective, the actions of hydrogen peroxide in household concentrations (3 to 9 percent by volume in a distilled water solution) are also oxidative, and therefore, solutions of dry hydrogen peroxide once mixed with water become reactive upon contact with the water, and will lose their potency after approximately five hours. Liquid solutions will maintain their potency so long as they are stored properly. Both dry and liquid forms of hydrogen peroxide offer a powerful, effective, non-invasive and environmentally clean household cleaner, disinfectant, odor eliminator and all around useful chemical compound.

Liquid household and cleaning dilutions range from 3 to approximately 9 percent. Released oxygen molecules act on the micro organic level to kill pathogens, molds fungi and anaerobic life forms. In this way, hydrogen peroxide oxidation could be said to be the least toxic form of antiseptic germicidal action.

This is not to say that hydrogen peroxide is not toxic and even fatal in higher concentrations if ingested. Household strength solutions of hydrogen peroxide should kept out of reach of children, and should be stored away from sources of heat, moisture and direct sunlight. Gloves should be worn for direct applications. Should skin become sensitive if exposed to hydrogen peroxide, the solution is always to run copious amounts of water over the affected area.

Hydrogen peroxide breaks down in UV light, when exposed to air (open container) or when mixed with water. Storage of hydrogen peroxide should be in a cool, dark location in containers which block UV light. Because hydrogen peroxide is volatile, tightly capped bottles should be loosened periodically to allow the release of built up oxygen. Under these storage conditions, hydrogen peroxide will lose its potency only very slowly, at a rate of less than 10 percent per year.

All commercially available hydrogen peroxide is date stamped for freshness. Over time hydrogen peroxide will lose its potency, and old containers of hydrogen peroxide should be emptied and recycled.

Hydrogen Peroxide Liquid and Dry Formulations

There are several forms of hydrogen peroxide available for household use. For many applications simple 3 percent hydrogen peroxide solution (same strength as found at the local drug or grocery store) will work perfectly. Particularly effective in kitchen disinfection, food grade hydrogen peroxide at 3 percent solution is the preferred choice for most applications where humans or their food come in contact with the surfaces being cleaned.

For some cleaning jobs that require more powerful deep cleaning and stain removing action, the most practical and reliable solution is to use a sodium percarbonate solution. Sodium percarbonate, also known as “dry hydrogen peroxide” is a mixture of soda ash, and hydrogen peroxide that is readily available from many environmentally friendly cleaning companies, from agricultural suppliers and directly from chemical suppliers.

For both food grade hydrogen peroxide (as the commercial 35 percent solution) and quantities of sodium percarbonate larger than two pounds, federal regulations require HazMat packaging standards for shipping. For this reason it is easier and less expensive to purchase food grade hydrogen peroxide solutions at 3, 4.5, 6 or 9 percent solutions when buying online or where shipping will be required and to purchase sodium percarbonate in 2 lb bucket containers. (You may purchase as many 2 lb bucket containers of sodium percarbonate as you need and have them shipped together and still not be liable for HazMat shipping containers. Hazmat shipping containers are only required for bulk packaging of sodium percarbonate (over 2 lb container size).

If you’re having trouble finding sodium percarbonate or do not want to purchase it online, most agricultural and garden supply centers will either carry it, or can easily order it for you. Agricultural grade sodium percarbonate does not differ from commercial cleaning grades and all sodium percarbonate remixes to an approximate 27 percent hydrogen peroxide solution when water is added in equal amounts.

If you’re thinking these are exotic or new materials that you should know more about before using, you may be surprised to know that sodium percarbonate in dilute mix with soda ash to reduce its strength to a 78 percent sodium percarbonate dry solid has been used in laundry and household cleaning for many years.

Perhaps you have heard of a rather popular “oxygen bleaching product” which entered the home cleaning market a few years ago: “Oxyclean”. Oxyclean is nothing more than sodium percarbonate and soda ash in this 78 percent strength formulation! Hydrogen peroxide, whether in its dry sodium percarbonate form or in a liquid solution, breaks down into non-toxic, environmentally friendly components: water, oxygen, and, in the case of sodium percarbonate, soda ash.

Liquid hydrogen peroxide is available in a variety of grades and dilutions, ranging from 3% drug store solutions all the way to 90% oxygenizers for rocket fuels.

 Using Hydrogen Peroxide

We’ve been taught by the chemical industry to expect instant results. The price of these instant results is often toxic chemical corrosives, acids or worse. When using sodium percarbonate or liquid hydrogen peroxide solutions, it may be necessary to allow the solutions to ‘work” actively for a few minutes.

When dealing with serious staining, either of concrete, carpeting, surfaces or clothing, a pre-soak period or activation time may be required. Throughout the e-book we have provided specific instructions including necessary activation time if needed for total effectiveness.

In some cases, adding a mild surfactant (a mild hand dishwashing liquid is an excellent choice) will assist the hydrogen peroxide in removing the stain. Often this is simply to help the hydrogen peroxide adhere to the stained surface in question, and/or to create a slight viscosity or “slipperiness” to the cleaning solution which aids in application.

In general, hydrogen peroxide can be safely and effectively combined with baking soda (bicarbonate of soda) to form an excellent cleaning and deep deodorizing paste. A few drops of liquid dish soap will add fragrance if desired, and viscosity.

Hydrogen peroxide should not be mixed with toxic commercial cleaners. It is a powerful oxidizing agent on its own, and without knowledge of the potential chemical reactions of toxic cleaning agents to oxidizers, it is unwise to experiment. Because hydrogen peroxide is such an effective anti-microbial, anti-fungal and anti-bacterial agent, no other chemical agents are required to accomplish proper cleaning.

The second thing about hydrogen peroxide to understand is that it is caustic at higher concentrations. The applications therefore specify which concentration of hydrogen peroxide is best suited for each particular purpose.

The human tendency to think “stronger is better” could lead to inadvertent bleaching or lightening of fabrics or other when working with hydrogen peroxide. 35 percent hydrogen peroxide solution is not suitable for direct application in any cleaning process, as it can cause oxidizing, or burning (quite literally burning holes through fabrics, for instance). A 3 to 4 percent solution of liquid hydrogen peroxide is perfectly effective for many household cleaning jobs; and higher concentrations are only advised for certain, specific tasks. Rather than assuming that a stronger concentration is needed, always repeat a single application at the same concentration in order to achieve the desired result.

Amazingly, once you learn this approach, you will find that hydrogen peroxide can do almost anything around your home when it comes to cleaning, and leaves a wonderful, fresh and really and truly clean home in its wake.

Finally, hydrogen peroxide is a chemical compound. It is a cleaning agent, among many other things. So wear your gloves when you are getting down and dirty and digging into those chores. Your skin will not be harmed by hydrogen peroxide, but prolonged exposure can cause itching and dry the skin. Besides, who wants their bare hands in whatever is being cleaned up? For simple counter top wipe downs gloves are not necessary, but if you’re headed into the boys’ bathroom with a toilet brush and scrubbing tools, by all means, don the gloves!

All hydrogen peroxide should be clearly marked as to their dilution ratios. Most common dilutions of 3 percent are completely adequate for most household cleaning jobs, and in fact, this is the standard dilution we use throughout our home. In many cases, using sodium percarbonate diluted to regular cleaning strength will work quite well for more difficult to clean areas, and a stronger concentration is recommended for removing black mold, feces, urine and other odor causing organic stains. Specific dilution ratios are included in each section of the ebook.

We have included a handy reference guide and cleaning formulations table in the back of the ebook. We recommend that you print this up and keep it where it is easily accessible until you have become familiar with using hydrogen peroxide for your household cleaning.

The Color Code System in This Ebook

Regular Strength; 3% liquid H2O2 or 1 oz (1/4 c) Sodium Percarbonate to 1 quart water (100 to 150 F)

 Double Strength ; 4.5 % liquid H2O2 or 2 oz. (1/2 c) Sodium Percarbonate to 1 quart water (100 to 150 F)

Extra Strength; 6 – 9% liquid H2O2 or 3 oz. (3/4 c) Sodium Percarbonate to 1 quart water (100 to 150F)

For more info please read the entire book.

Hydrogen Peroxide Science Related Resources:

               NSF (National Science Foundation)

               ESA/International Hydrogen Peroxide Propulsion Conference

               Scitation.org Digital Science Documents

               Pure Energy Systems Wiki – Community-built energy information site

               Chinese Showcase Eco-friendly Cars

               Dr. Majid Ali’s Aging Healthfully Virtual Library – Dr. Majid Ali- Integrative Medicine Editor of Integrative Medicine Journal

               The Many Benefits Of Hydrogen Peroxide – Article

Waterborne diseases are caused by pathogenic microorganisms which are directly transmitted when contaminated drinking water is consumed. Contaminated drinking water, used in the preparation of food, can be the source of foodborne disease through consumption of the same microorganisms. According to the World Health Organization, diarrheal disease accounts for an estimated 4.1% of the total DALY global burden of disease and is responsible for the deaths of 1.8 million people every year. It was estimated that 88% of that burden is attributable to unsafe water supply, sanitation and hygiene, and is mostly concentrated in children in developing countries.

Waterborne disease can be caused by protozoa, viruses, bacteria, and parasites.

To see an illustration how our water supply can become contaminated by common toxins, click here; http://www.ecowateraz.com/go/how-water.php

Dysentery

Dysentery’s Roots

Dysentery is most commonly caused by one of two different organisms: One is a bacterium called Shigella; the other is caused by an amoeba. Shigella is the most important cause of bloody diarrhea because it destroys cells that line the large intestine, which leads to mucosal ulcers in the intestine. The mucosal ulcers cause the bloody diarrhea. Ingesting as few as 10 to 100 bacteria, which can be contained in a tiny amount of infected food or water, can cause disease.

Amoebic dysentery is prevalent in regions where human excrement is used as fertilizer. The amoebas that cause dysentery can form cysts, which are like bacterial spores that can become inactive and highly resistant to environmental conditions. In other words, they can live a long time outside the body and then reactivate and cause disease when conditions become favorable.

Cysts and live amoebas are excreted in the feces of an infected person, but only the cysts can survive outside the body. The amoebic infection is milder in comparison with bacterial dysentery. Despite this, amoebic dysentery is more difficult to treat and cure; bacterial dysentery responds better and more quickly to treatment.

Both types of dysentery infect people of diverse age, sex, and ethnic backgrounds, although children are more susceptible.

Protozoal infections

Parasitic Infections

Bacterial infections

• Botulism – Clostridium botulinum bacteria – gastro-intestinal food/water borne; can grow in food
• Campylobacteriosis
• Cholera – Vibrio cholerae bacteria – gastro-intestinal often waterborne
• Chronic granulomatous disease – caused by the Mycobacterium marinum infection and localized in skin, frequently occurred with aquarium keepers.^[
• Diarrheal disease due to E. coli.
• Dysentery – Shigella/Salmonella bacteria – gastro-intestinal food/water
• Legionellosis – cause Pontiac fever and Legionnaires’ disease
• Leptospirosis-

• Otitis externa- “Swimmer’s Ear”
• Typhoid – Salmonella typhi bacteria – gastro-intestinal water/food borne.
• Salmonellosis – due to many Salmonella species. Water/food/direct contact borne.
• Vibrio illness caused by the bacteria of Vibrio vulnificus, Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus commonly found in seafood and recreational water.

Viral Infections

• Adenovirus infection – its serotypes are typically waterborne
• Astroviruses –
• Caliciviruses –
• Circoviruses – its human form of Transfusion Transmitted Virus found in feces, saliva, skin and hair.
• Coronaviruses – cause SARS and excreted in the feces.
• Enteric Adenoviruses –
• Hepatitis A – Hepatitis A virus – gastro-intestinal water/food borne
• Parvoviruses – associated with Gastroenteritis
• Picobimaviruses – associated with Gastroenteritis in AIDS patients, children and elderlies.
• Polio – polioviruses – gastro-intestinal exposure to untreated.
• Polyomaviruses – its human form of JC virus cause Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and detected in sewage
• Small Round Structured Virus

From: doug@d-w-m.com

University of California, Davis Medical Center 2315 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, California 95817

As a seventh grade student, Claire Nelson learned that di(ethylhexyl)adepate (DEHA), considered a carcinogen, is found in plastic wrap. She also learned that the FDA had never studied the effect of microwave cooking on plastic-wrapped food. Three years later, with encouragement from her high school science teacher, Claire set out to test what the FDA had not.

Although she had an idea for studying the effect of microwave radiation on plastic wrapped food, she did not have the equipment. Eventually, Dr. Jon Wilkes at the National Center for Toxicological Research agreed to help her. The research center, which is affiliated with the FDA, let her use its facilities to perform her experiments, which involved microwaving plastic wrap in virgin olive oil.

Claire tested four different plastic wraps and “found not just the carcinogens but also xenoestrogen was migrating [into the oil]….” Xenoestrogens are linked to low sperm counts in men and to breast cancer in women. Throughout her junior and senior years, Claire made a couple of trips each week to the research center, which was 25 miles from her home, to work on her experiment. An article in Options reported “her analysis found that DEHA was migrating into the oil at between 200 parts and 500 parts per million. The FDA standard is 0.05 parts per billion.”

Her summarized results have been published in science journals. Claire Nelson received the American Chemical Society’s top science prize for students during her junior year and fourth place at the International Science and Engineering Fair (Fort Worth,Texas) as a senior. “Carcinogens –At 10,000,000 Times FDA Limits” Options, May 2000. Published by People Against Cancer, 515-972-4444 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              515-972-4444      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

http://www.relfe.com/microwave.html

Candida Albicans is a naturally occurring yeast and is among the many organisms that live in the mouth and gastrointestinal tract.

Candidiasis is an overgrowth of this yeast. This complex, which is usually referred to as Candida, causes a broad spectrum of symptoms, many of which are centered around, but certainly not limited to, gastrointestinal distress. Candida can be pervasive and truly wreak havoc upon one’s physical and mental state if it isn’t addressed.

Candidiasis has been considered an important factor in AIDS, rheumatoid arthritis, MS, schizophrenia, hyploglycemia and at least 20 other conditions. Some also believe that it is a causative factor in “Chronic Fatigue Syndrome”.

Some of the symptoms which one might experience if there is an overgrowth of yeast are;

fatigue

depression

painful joints

poor memory

feelings of “spaciness’

digestive disturbance

food allergies & sensitivities

abdominal pain-bloating

sugar cravings

dry, itchy, tingling or burning skin

vaginal infections

low body temperature

PMS

hormonal disturbance

While these symptoms can be caused by other factors, certainly adopting a protocol which will eliminate yeast, will most certainly help with many of these symptoms. A shift to a healthy, nutritive diet, free of yeast-feeding foods, will be the first step to better health, whether or not you have yeast!

Some elements which can make Candida grow are;

antibiotics

birth-control pills

faulty diet; high sugar or carb. content

yeast containing foods

alcohol

some drugs

compromised immunity

sugar, white flour, caffeine, aspirin, chocolate, fluoride, nitrates, sedatives and STRESS are all “nutrient destroyers”

If you suspect that you may have an overgrowth of yeast, it’s important not to self-treat or diagnose this condition. You can go to www.theyeastconnection.com for a wealth of information. There you can answer questions to begin to determine if you might have a yeast problem. Then, see your Doctor or licensed health care practitioner, and have a GI panel done to get accurate testing and diagnosis.

Once you know that yeast overgrowth is an issue for you, you must eliminate the factors which are causing the problem. If you choose to rely on drugs, know that future outbreaks are probable. Antibiotics promote the growth of Candida and kill good bowel flora. Synthetic anti-fungals and other drugs used for Candidiasis can be toxic to the organs, damage the liver, weaken the immune system and many people find that their symptoms persist after taking drugs.

We highly recommend choosing a natural approach to addressing Candidiasis. The body/mind has a powerful self-healing ability, and given the right elements, will find it’s way back to balance without the use of drugs. Boosting immunity through a healthy, mostly alkaline diet (see Acid/Alkaline discussion), supplementation, rebuilding healthy intestinal bacteria and creating a balanced emotional life is a powerful arsenal!

Begin by eliminating all sugars and sugar products, especially processed white sugar. Also; high fructose corn syrup, maple syrup, brown rice syrup, honey, corn syrup, fructose, sucrose, lactose, etc. Fruit juice is best avoided, as it is concentrated sugar. Do not ever use artificial sweeteners. Do not ever drink soda pop or sweetened drinks.

You will also need to eliminate dairy products, butter, all white flour products, bread, pasta, pastries, white rice, potatoes, alcoholic beverages, vinegar, fermented foods, salad dressings, pickled products, roasted nuts, soy sauce, tamari, crackers, fried foods, pork,  bacon, cheese,  and processed foods of any kind.

Cheese, alcohol, melons, peanuts, dried fruits, cured meats, raw mushrooms, yeast breads and brewer’s yeast all contain mold or yeast and must be avoided. You should also avoid citrus fruits, pineapples and tomatoes.

Fresh vegetables (except potatoes, corn and yams), small amounts of gluten-free grains (millet, brown rice, quinoa, buckwheat, amaranth), eggs, fish, chicken, turkey (preferably organic) should be emphasized. You want to be more alkaline, get optimum nutrition and increase your fiber, thus creating healthy elimination. You may want to consider a colonics or enemas as you begin to rid the body of any toxins.

There are many herbal remedies and supplements for Candida-probiotics are essential. As mentioned before, the website www.theyeastconnection.com gives very helpful and more comprehensive information on yeast overgrowth and how to address it.

Do your own research online to find other websites which may be helpful and to find products which are specifically designed to attack the yeasts. If you want to consider a cleanse, the book “Cleanse & Purify Thyself”, by Richard Anderson is a wonderful resource.

Emotions are a strong component with Candida and it is crucial to look into yourself and do some mental and emotional cleansing. Consider the assistance of an experienced professional to help you reveal subconscious emotions, beliefs and programs which can be the underlying cause of yeast overgrowth. Breathwork is also very useful and will benefit you for a lifetime.

Best wishes on your journey to greater health, joy and clarity of mind. The efforts it takes to rid yourself of yeast overgrowth is a small thing in the light of vibrant health and happiness!!!